🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 237+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Pyrex Butterprint Dish

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (237 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

PRICE IS FOR ONEin superb condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Pyrex Butterprint Dish

PRICE IS FOR ONE
in remarkable condition​

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 763208

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Butter Dishes

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price: $30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4648 reviews

KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic quality​
I think the Vintage Pyrex Butterprint Dish will last a reasonable amount of time.
18 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
For the price, the Vintage Pyrex Butterprint Dish feels solid and it works for me.
10 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous investment
For the price, it is effortless to use and I don’t regret it.
7 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
From my experience, the Vintage Pyrex Butterprint Dish works well enough so I’m okay with it.
42 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply astonishing
the Vintage Pyrex Butterprint Dish performs as expected which is good enough.
4 people found this helpful