🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 179+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage ceramic frog

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (179 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15.48
$25.8
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

A vintage Bombay ceramic frog candle holder with lid

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage ceramic frog

A vintage Bombay ceramic frog candle holder with lid

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 625903

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Teapots

Original Price:$25.8 USD

Sale Price: $15.48 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8935 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds
9 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier decision
The Vintage ceramic frog seems long-lasting enough for regular use.
24 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent quality
The Vintage ceramic frog works superb for me.
31 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
At first, the Vintage ceramic frog is uncomplicated to use so I’m okay with it. Arrived on time.
37 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading Vintage ceramic frog ever
For the price, the Vintage ceramic frog feels okay so it’s acceptable.
15 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Boston, MA​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless purchase
After a few days, it works well enough and I don’t regret it. Nothing fancy.
16 people found this helpful