🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 150+ reviews
Men βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Skull Ring with Ruby eyes

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (150 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$35​
$58.33
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Pewter ring with ruby gemstones. Ring size is 10.5/11.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Skull Ring with Ruby eyes

Pewter ring with ruby gemstones. Ring size is 10.5/11.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 616467

Category: Men > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price:$58.33 USD

Sale Price: $35 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2204 reviews
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid Skull Ring with Ruby eyes!
After a few days, the Skull Ring with Ruby eyes performs as expected and I don’t regret it.
17 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
The Skull Ring with Ruby eyes arrived on time and works fine.
30 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
At first, it does the job and it’s fine overall. distribution was normal.
41 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· newly-released York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
The Skull Ring with Ruby eyes looks similar to the listing photos.
43 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase 
5 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really terrific
So far, the Skull Ring with Ruby eyes fits my needs which is good enough. Works fine so far.
42 people found this helpful