🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 506+ reviews
Women βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

MAEVE 50 - timeless heels

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (506 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$395
$658.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Shoe tip : Square toeHeel type : Block heelFastening : Slip onPattern : PlainArticle number : ST511B07X-Q11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy dispatch

↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

MAEVE 50 - timeless heels

Shoe tip : Square toe
Heel type : Block heel
Fastening : Slip on
Pattern : Plain
Article number : ST511B07X-Q11​

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 267873

Category: Women > Shoes > Pumps

Original Price:$658.33 USD

Sale Price: $395 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 transport & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9494 reviews
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints​
At first, the MAEVE 50 - retro heels feels okay so it’s acceptable.
36 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans
5 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
reliable for this type of MAEVE 50 - enduring heels.
45 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase 
5 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
finest MAEVE 50 - vintage heels ever
The MAEVE 50 - vintage heels feels okay in use.
7 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
wonderful MAEVE 50 - retro heels
To be fair, the MAEVE 50 - vintage heels works as described and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
30 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent product
So far, it is uncomplicated to use so it’s acceptable.
10 people found this helpful