🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 839+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

16 mil film projector

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (839 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$200
$333.33
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Belmont 16 millimeter film projector original works

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery

↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

16 mil film projector

Belmont 16 millimeter film projector original works​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 263422

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Electronics

Original Price:$333.33 USD

Sale Price: $200 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5030 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply astonishing​
After assorted use, it is straightforward to use and I’m satisfied.
5 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson
7 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
So far, it works well enough which is good enough. dispatch was normal.
6 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase 
8 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate love love!
After a few days, the 16 mil film projector is hassle-on the house to use so it’s acceptable.
37 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceeded expectations
For the price, the 16 mil film projector is practical so I’m okay with it.
45 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading 16 mil film projector ever
Everything about the 16 mil film projector seems fine.
21 people found this helpful