๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.6/5 from 376+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.6 out of 5 (376 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12
$20
Sale
โœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

- not once used- limited edition -24oz

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
speedy shipment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler

- not once used
- limited edition
-24oz​

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 237226

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Tumblers

Original Price:$20 USD

Sale Price: $12 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.6
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 2955 reviews

RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Jacksonville, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
finest decision​
The Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler is simple to use and looks magnificent. So happy with this purchase!
48 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท St. Louis, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Worth every penny
After a few days, the Starbucks Christmas 2023 Tumbler is practical which is good enough.
7 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท San Jose, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
finest
Honestly, it feels solid enough and it works for me. Packaging was elementary.
19 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
For the price, it works well enough which is good enough.
46 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Columbus, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Outstanding!
From my experience, it works as described which feels reasonable.
46 people found this helpful